• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This was such an enjoyable look into someone’s life.

    • _bug0ut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Peter Santanello’s videos are usually really enjoyable and pleasant. He has a calm, respectful demeanor and he just goes to random places you usually don’t think about and just kind of shoots the shit with people. He did a couple videos a while back where he went to a couple of native reservations in like one of the Dakotas, I think, and they were an intensely interesting look into that life and culture.

      His titles can feel kind of click-baity sometimes and I don’t always agree with his take on things, but I find him a really likeable and honest-seeming guy.

    • UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wasn’t there a Vice series like way back in the day where they’d go spend time with people in remote locations and just see how they lived? Maybe I’m imagining it and it was just about drugs. But, I think that was a thing because I remember thinking it was super interesting.

      • kite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Edit: so either my app is showing comment threads oddly, or he edited his comment, making my reply completely nonsensical. Originally, he said the video was scammy bullshit, and that he knew it for “two simple reasons.” His 1st was that no one living like that would actually jump on a horse from the rear, and the second was that no one ever sleeps over animals because they’d die of methane poisoning. I guess he couldn’t argue my reply so just changed his narrative instead.

        End edit.

        Where is the Lemmy version of /r/confidentlyincorrect? People have kept livestock on the first floor of their homes for thousands of years; the heat from the animals helped to keep them warm, and it kept the livestock safe from thieves. And no one sleeping above livestock is going to die of cow farts. Bless your heart.

        Housebarns have been used the world over for thousands of years

  • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Actually he said he does have a social security number, just that he doesn’t have the card and doesn’t know what it is.

    • Betty White In HD@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      He says he “revoked” the number after he “studied the issue”, so it’s possible he doesn’t have a SSN based on a religious exemption.

      People generally cannot voluntarily withdraw or stop participating in the Social Security program. You must pay Social Security taxes, regardless of you or your employer’s citizenship or place of residence. Unless specifically exempt by law, everyone working in the United States must pay Social Security taxes on earnings from covered employment. The law makes an exemption only in very limited circumstances for members of certain religious sects.

      https://faq.ssa.gov/en-us/Topic/article/KA-02214

      I’d take what he says with a grain of salt, but that’s what he said.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m just curious… In this day and age of a billion entertainment options, how do people decide an hour random video is worth it? I was questioning if it was five minutes of my time, then I found out it’s a fuckin HOUR

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I actually am curious. Is there a type of video that you see that you think “an hour, that sounds good”? I see an hour and think “this better be a quality documentary” or whatever.

        • Betty White In HD@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well I guess a reasonable adult would probably start first by reading the title and description and looking at the thumbnail and seeing if that topic is at all interesting to them to watch. If not, they can move on. If yes then they can click on it, watch a little bit and decide whether they are still interested and whether they are willing to allocate time to this over something else and then consider that they can watch this at their own pace because it’s an online video. They can then decide to watch it all in one go or pause it and come back to it another time if they’re still interested.

          I personally watched it all in one go as I was eating dinner and doing some side stuff because this was an interesting conversation and a look into a sort of lifestyle that is alien to me and it was presented in a digestible and very personal fashion and I was enjoying it the entire time I was watching it.

          Does that answer your question?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            2 years ago

            No, you definitely didn’t answer the question but you managed to imply I’m a child.

            FYI an actual complaint would have been “you linked to the embedded version of this video which hides the length of the video so I had to open it twice and then discover it’s insanely long and I don’t have time to be watching hour long videos”

            But that’s not what I said. This place is looking more like reddit every day. 90% of my interactions here have been positive before the last couple of days. I wish that didn’t feel like it was changing.