☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoFree Thinkerlemmy.mlimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1188arrow-down127
arrow-up1161arrow-down1imageFree Thinkerlemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squarejoenforcer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down12·2 months agoEver hear of the prisoner’s dilemma?
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 months ago“Hey friend, can you share some of your potato chips?” “Sorry, prisoners dilemma, can’t.”
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·2 months agoName dropping a game theory hypothetical is not an argument.
minus-squarejoenforcer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down16·2 months agoYou’re right, it’s not an argument. But it’s a perfectly sufficient reply to a one-word question that doesn’t properly provide an argument of its own.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoYour original comment only garnered a one word question because you were too vague.
minus-squarejoenforcer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 months agoThe original comment that garnered a one word response wasn’t mine. Thanks though.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThere was a vague “argument,” followed by a request for elaboration, followed by another somehow more vague “argument” from yourself.
Ever hear of the prisoner’s dilemma?
“Hey friend, can you share some of your potato chips?”
“Sorry, prisoners dilemma, can’t.”
Yep, you got it!
Name dropping a game theory hypothetical is not an argument.
You’re right, it’s not an argument. But it’s a perfectly sufficient reply to a one-word question that doesn’t properly provide an argument of its own.
Your original comment only garnered a one word question because you were too vague.
The original comment that garnered a one word response wasn’t mine. Thanks though.
There was a vague “argument,” followed by a request for elaboration, followed by another somehow more vague “argument” from yourself.