OpenAI said the structure will help it raise more money.
  • Wren@lemmy.worldEnglish
    03·
    2 months ago

    Because it’s a ridiculous thing to question someone on and the dude is a known troll that I have zero respect for.

    Is that enough of a reason?

    I simply said that I called out OpenAI back when people defended it. What about this requires proof? It’s a dumb hill to fight on let alone die on.

    • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      21·
      2 months ago

      Ah, now he’s a well known troll.

      Now i don’t know much about the users here, so could be he’s a troll. But i don’t see him as trolling you in this discussion, he asked a good faith question, and you go completely off the rails…

      The proof that would be required would be you calling out openai and people defending them. I mean, that’s just blindingly obvious you know. The few times i referenced something i did in the past in a discussion, i linked my previous posts showing that, otherwise i could claim anything. It just seems like the most basic etiquette in a discussion. You said people were defending openAI here on lemmy when you were calling them out. And now people are curious about this and you’re like “i’ll never show you”.

      I really don’t get how that’s so difficult for you. Great that you saw the openai bullshit coming from a mile away, but that doesn’t mean you have to act this ridiculous when someone is curious to the context and asks you for an example when they did the effort to find such an example and couldn’t…

      And to not be too hypocritical XD. Here’s an example of me linking to a previous post when i thought it matter to show i was saying what i was saying before more information about a subject came to light: https://old.reddit.com/r/TrackMania/comments/njq0q0/lots_of_people_have_been_saying_that_he_just_made/gz9it8s/

      • Wren@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        There was no good faith whatsoever in the question, because the answer is irrelevant to the topic. Dude is fishing for a debate and chose this hill to plant a flag.

        He’s now responding to my comment on this discussion, as he has in others where I wasn’t even talking to him. Do you need more reason why I won’t bother with this clown?

        He’s an antagonist.

              • Wren@lemmy.worldEnglish
                1·
                2 months ago

                Dude… seriously. What the fuck is wrong with you? You’re picking a fight for no reason over something that you stand to gain nothing for winning.

                If it were true that I am lying as you say- that I didn’t call out OpenAI for years as I claimed, what exactly do you win here? What the get?

                Why the fuck are you harassing me over this?

                Of ALL the comments on this post- you chose to harass me. Is it because your comments were removed from a community I moderate? Is this personal? Is it because I insulted you by stating that I’ve not liked what OpenAI has been doing for years?

                Or is it that you not like that I chose to not obey your demand for proof? Do you feel that you are obligated to any information you ask for? Do you not understand that you’re not owed explanations simply because you want them?

                As I said, I’m not going through years worth of comments of multiple accounts over multiple social media platforms just to appease a troll. I’d you don’t believe me- I don’t give a fuck.

                So whatever beef you have with me- that’s on you, as I don’t care enough about you to even make an attempt to squash it.

                I’ll hope that you find some peace and find a way to eventually get a life. Seriously…