• nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

    It indiscriminately pollutes whatever environment it’s conducted within, and causes secondary harm to non-participants by incentivising hoarding of PII in the cheapest and least secure manner.

    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It causes genuine harm, I’m visually impaired and I’ve wandered into construction zones because advertising billboards are mounted near and “road work ahead” signs and everything is all just bright and bold.

      I don’t know what’s official, everything is competing for my attention but I have very little capacity to dedicate my full attention to a visual sign. The end result is incredibly fatiguing, seeing a bright sign and straining to ensure I read it because it’s colours look important, nope, it’s an ad, that was a waste of energy, oh look another one with the same blurry colours and type setting it’s probably the same ad… Nope that one actually needed my attention, and now I’m somewhere I shouldn’t be and I’m in danger.

      I’m also hard of hearing, but fortunately audio adber in the public isn’t as bad, but anyone who’s hearing impaired knows how fatiguing it is to try and filter through noise. It’s the exact same for visual impairment.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t think the facts match the claim, but I completely agree with the sentiment.

    For years, the ‘legit’ consumer has had to deal with ad interruptions and bad UI and service disruptions and having media removed from their library. Something that pirates don’t even have to think about. The music revolution that Jobs and Apple created with iTunes, which allowed people to just buy music and just own it and just use it however they want (no DRM) with an ease that made piracy look difficult and seem too risky to bother, never came for TV or movies or books or any other media category.

    And now the streaming revolution has all but undone that progress as well. You don’t own anything, a company decides when you have or lose access to something, and even if you pay money for access you are still advertised to and your data is still sold off.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I remember iTunes only letting you change computer like 2-3 times max before the drm would make mysic not work any more, but maybe it was no-drm in the beginning.

      I had a chinese 1GB shuffle though so IDK if that’s correct.

      The chinese shuffle also doubled up as a usb key (very useful back then) and also didn’t need iTunes to function smh.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah this guy is on some Apple fanboy shit if he thinks iTunes was drm free. Their shitty design for iTunes and decision to force you to use it despite it making the experience of listening to music much worse is the primary reason an ipod is the only Apple device I’ve ever owned. Freedom of choice and Apple have never mixed. That’s such a weird angle to take when describing them.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have legit never bought a single thing because I saw and ad for said product. I don’t know who is out here making these campaigns so profitable

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t know, I distrust all YouTube ads content creators slide into their videos, because the products are either useless to me, disappointing in real life like the “fruit smells” rings for water bottles or sketchy with some fear mongering like the VPNs.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah I’m not gonna be paying for NordVPN. They’ve got this much money for ads and when buying 2 years at a time they’re cheaper than, say, Mullvad? Suspicious.

          I do like some of the channels’ sponsor segments though. Internet Historian is great, OverSimplified can do pretty good ones. The Map Men are pure gold. But I’ve never bought into anything they’ve shilled at me, nor do I feel like I want to.

      • Nyxon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        qittorrent has a search function where you input and save the associated plug-in/address of the torrent site/feed you want and then you can just search within qbittorrent for whatever torrent you are looking for and select whatever you want for download without having to go to an website or another app/protocol.