• sethboy66@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The U.S. isn’t a signatory to the convention and nations exist in a state of anarchy, one cannot (in an official capacity) impose their will over another without consent. There are other agreements between Turkey and the U.S. which would permit any and all passage, so in the absence of the Montreux Convention (which is indeed absent in this case) the U.S. can sail a carrier right on through without breaking any agreed-upon rules.

    • Fuck Lemmy.World @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The U.S. isn’t a signatory to the convention

      No but this doesn’t matter, the Montreux convention doesn’t bind the US but it does bind Turkey and the US still needs Turkey’s permission to pass through the straits, as they’re not international waters but Turkish territorial waters.

      The whole Montreux convention is about how Turkey should govern the passing of civilian and military ships through the straits.

      so in the absence of the Montreux Convention (which is indeed absent in this case)

      False. See above.

      the U.S. can sail a carrier right on through without breaking any agreed-upon rules

      Turkey would be the one breaking the convention by letting that carrier through.