• realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah I was kind of curious as to how this story would be spun into a negative story against Trump. Anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately. Maybe “the president can’t set the sentence” will be the tack with this one?

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, how can the potential next head of state threatening a specific individual with an arbitrary sentence of life imprisonment for some vague charge like “doing anything illegal” possibly be spun into a negative story?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s Trump trying to find a way. In specific, find a way to do something outside of his presidential powers.

          He wanted to “lock her up” with Hillary too. Were you one of the people chanting that? Have you noticed she hasn’t been locked up yet even though he had four years to do it?

          • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Have you noticed she hasn’t been locked up yet even though he had four years to do it?

            I’ll just leave that there. It makes the point I would have made pretty succinctly.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If a life sentence is appropriate for interfering with an election, I look forward to Trump’s impending life sentence.

      Because anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately, right?

      • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fair enough. The “perfect phone call” was actually pretty bad, it’s the one case against him that I think probably has a lot of merit. I was thinking at the time that it was probably illegal.

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You do realize that when Trump says “anything illegal” he really means “anything I don’t like”, right?

      Also, surely you think that Trump should be sentenced appropriately for violating federal law at Arlington cemetery?

      • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The logical line of “when the guy I don’t like says anything, he really means what I say he means” is pretty errant and toxic. I cringe when the right does it too, “you can tell a Democrat is lying because they’ve opened their mouth”. It’s stupid and ridiculous.

        IDK what happened for sure at the cemetery, I’d need some footage and to read up on the pertaining law a little before I make a judgement on that.

          • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The US Army releasing a statement that a) what Trump and his campaign did there was illegal and b) that they physically attacked the person who tried to stop them from breaking the law isn’t good enough for you?

            Why would it be? Does the government tell the truth all the time?