• folekaule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sounds like great incentive for Zuck to do everything in his power to make sure Trump doesn’t get reelected.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Last time I checked, the executive didn’t decide about indictments or sentences. But I guess that’s all going to change if Dementia Don wins.

    • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I was kind of curious as to how this story would be spun into a negative story against Trump. Anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately. Maybe “the president can’t set the sentence” will be the tack with this one?

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, how can the potential next head of state threatening a specific individual with an arbitrary sentence of life imprisonment for some vague charge like “doing anything illegal” possibly be spun into a negative story?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think it’s Trump trying to find a way. In specific, find a way to do something outside of his presidential powers.

            He wanted to “lock her up” with Hillary too. Were you one of the people chanting that? Have you noticed she hasn’t been locked up yet even though he had four years to do it?

            • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Have you noticed she hasn’t been locked up yet even though he had four years to do it?

              I’ll just leave that there. It makes the point I would have made pretty succinctly.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You do realize that when Trump says “anything illegal” he really means “anything I don’t like”, right?

        Also, surely you think that Trump should be sentenced appropriately for violating federal law at Arlington cemetery?

        • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The logical line of “when the guy I don’t like says anything, he really means what I say he means” is pretty errant and toxic. I cringe when the right does it too, “you can tell a Democrat is lying because they’ve opened their mouth”. It’s stupid and ridiculous.

          IDK what happened for sure at the cemetery, I’d need some footage and to read up on the pertaining law a little before I make a judgement on that.

            • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The US Army releasing a statement that a) what Trump and his campaign did there was illegal and b) that they physically attacked the person who tried to stop them from breaking the law isn’t good enough for you?

              Why would it be? Does the government tell the truth all the time?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If a life sentence is appropriate for interfering with an election, I look forward to Trump’s impending life sentence.

        Because anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately, right?

        • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fair enough. The “perfect phone call” was actually pretty bad, it’s the one case against him that I think probably has a lot of merit. I was thinking at the time that it was probably illegal.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Illegal? Like marking legitimate news stories that criticize Trump as spam to scare away voters from reading them?

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It would be cool with me if both Zuckerberg and Donald went to jail for the rest of their lives.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d actually prefer the justice system abide by the law and current sentencing guidelines. But like yes, obviously he should be prosecuted if he breaks the law just like…anyone else you might name.

  • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If it would be a life sentence, then Zuckerburg might as well assassinate him.

    (note: this is hypothetical, I’m not advocating Trump’s assassination, I much prefer he win less than 40% of the popular vote and less than 200 EVs, and that he runs again for President in 2028, 2032, and 2036)