• netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Funny how he made it basically for his desktop computer.

    33 years later, and Linux is dominating in every part of the OS world except … the desktop.

    (I’m paraphrasing his quote – he said something like this years ago, can’t find it, though.)

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I would argue that it does dominate the desktop now as well, just not by usage numbers.

      If I was told I had to use a windows desktop these days at home I think I’d start investing in a very large book collection.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Without a distro to rally behind I’m personally somewhat skeptical. Ubuntu was the best shot we had but since switching everything over to SNAPs it’s on the slow side. With the number of Windows ads and early end of support for Windows 10 there’s a real opportunity for desktop Linux, but until there’s a well supported distro that genuinely doesn’t require using the terminal I can’t see there being mass adoption.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          My grandmother ran Linux for a couple decades until her death at 101 years old. My 80+ year old mom has been running Linux for at least 2 decades. Yes, I’m tech support, but I don’t really have to do anything. It just works.

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    …probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks,as that’s all I have. :-(.

    Cuteness.

    As in hilarity.

  • pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just look at those nested parentheses. A true sign of (pedantic) greatness, when a person needs to clarify something in their earlier clarification.

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love it™ (The nested parentheses are one of the greatest tools known to mankind (And to all other creatures))

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have been stopping myself from using those and instead restructure my sentence. But if people like it, guess I can start keeping it.

        I do find it more useful, however, to have a kind of a reference to the thing written at the end instead [1], but markdown doesn’t seem to have anything for that, and using the syntax for Markdown references, is only useful for hyperlinks, or if the reader is willing to read the hover text 2.

        [1]: Like This. I would love it if the markdown viewer would link the above [1] to this line. Maybe with a scrolldown effect.

      • sramder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I had a teacher that screamed at me for “taking the lords name in vain…” They’re definitely wrong from time-to-time ;-)

        • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I had a science teacher that told us, “If you sneeze three times and nobody blesses you, the devil takes your soul!”

          It’s science.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The amount of effort I do to try and avoid using double parentesis is trully herculean.

      I think that stuff is the product of a completionist/perfectionist mindset - as one is writting, important details/context related to the main train of thought pop-up in one’s mind and as one is writting those, important details/context related to the other details/context pop-up in one’s mind (and the tendency is to keep going down the rabbit hole of details/context on details/context).

      You get this very noticeably with people who during a conversation go out on a tangent and often even end up losing the train of thought of the main conversation (a tendecy I definitelly have) since one doesn’t get a chance to go back and re-read, reorganise and correct during a spoken conversation.

      Personally I don’t think it’s an actual quality (sorry to all upvoters) as it indicates a disorganised mind. It is however the kind of thing one overcomes with experience and I bet Mr Torvalds himself is mostly beyond it by now.

      • MrShankles@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        perfectionist mindset - as one is writing,

        I think an “M-Dash (perfectionist mindest— as one is writing,)” would be more appropriate than an “N-Dash” in your statement. No ‘nested’ parentheses needed (unless you’re looking to add non-essential (though insightful) info to your sentence); but the type of… “PAUSE” makes all the difference

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some of those parens could’ve been replaced with commas and retain their meaning (that’s what I do to avoid nesting, so that it doesn’t get confusing).

        • Farid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ve never seen that being used, but it seems it’s a thing in English. What if you wanna best deeper? Do you go {}? Then <>? «»?

          • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not really an English thing so much as a math thing that makes too much sense to not use elsewhere. For instance, in math you might have x[3 - 7{3y + (a * b)}]. I haven’t actually seen them go deeper than three sets, though, so I’m not sure what would be next.

            • ElTacoEsMiPastor@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.

              so when bp = 300x - 3, this:

              4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

              would turn to

              4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

              perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though

              just picture it:

              4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000

  • vu2tum@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Just a hobby, won’t be big” - he really didn’t think it will be one of the most sought after projects.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I for one really appreciate the effort of supporting non-AT drives despite the initial skepticism.

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    That post changed my life, gave me a great hobby, which became a career, and still puts food on the table for me and my family to this day. Thank you, Linus.

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah… but it was just RMS yelling at people from a street corner, nobody actually used it until Linux came along ;-)

      • pelya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m pretty sure Apple and Google already rewritten all important GNU parts into something with Apache or BSD license, to throw everything GPL licensed out of their embedded systems. The biggest and most important part was obviously GCC, replaced by Clang.

        How many GPL-licensed system libraries and tools are in Android right now, except for the kernel? I’m pretty sure the answer is zero.

        • sramder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, gotta’ love how all the Apple fanboys were like Bash? Meh’ zsh is the superior shell in the span of a day.

          I mean was the GPL viral… yeah probably. But it’s not like the courts came after either of them. Or ever really will in a meaningful way. Although hope springs eternal for non-webkit browsers in the not-EU 😌

          • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            What’s wrong with ZSH? I was using it for 5+ years before it became the default over bash, mainly because of the auto complete features, oh-my-zsh and later just plugins and powerlevel10k.

            • sramder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Oh I didn’t think there’s anything wrong with it, I love oh-my-zsh. But it did feel like a bit of a cannery in the coal mine scenario when they elevated it the default and said they would phase out bash because of the GPL license.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    There’s no guessing what will catch the world by storm. At a party once, Bram Cohen tried to get me interested in his ideas for a a peer-to-peer protocol, and I thought nothing of it.