This person has also said many transphobic and misogynistic things to me before. Lemmy.ml is a fucking joke, I’m only on here to check trans places everywhere
https://lemmy.ml/post/17190483/11831213
edit: He’s been banned by dessalines. But nutomic (an admin) and davel (an admin and hexbear user) has been defending him in the comments. They should go too, wtf
He posted here, but I don’t think hexbears can see it for some reason.
we cant see it because he was banned for misogyny months ago
Ah that makes sense, thanks.
My reply to this random pedo loser:
I think I can speak for most of us here
Yeah big agree.
This is manipulative of him and a misuse of an argument people have used about a different situation. A trusted user here once pointed out correctly that lolicon should not be called CSAM because victims orgs who created that term have been very serious about making sure that term is used correctly to describe situations in which a child was actually abused. That doesn’t make lolicon morally correct to create or consume, just that its an incorrect use of an important term.
BUT THATS NOT THE ISSUE BEING DISCUSSED HERE. Making deepfakes of an actual flesh and blood child that actually exists is child abuse. The “defamation and libel” he describes is abusive, so its not incorrect to call it CSAM.
Its just weird pedentry and a fucking weird ass hill to die on lmao, in addition to not being correct.
he followed it up with “can’t make using AI programs to turn pictures of actual children naked to bully and harass them illegal because then scissors would also have to be made illegal”
I would really like to know how having deepfake porn of yourself has “no real world consequences” for the child being deepfaked. Kids will bully young girls for less.
Well you see, the person in question is also a misogynist pig, so he likely doesn’t care about a young girls feelings at all.
it should have none for the victim, but it is as you say and people will pile on.
Hey pedo apologist, you don’t even know what the word reactionary means.
Dude is unironically more reactionary than anyone calling him out.
Next they’re gonna pull some Stallman shit saying the victim’s not a child, but a teenager? Same level of semantic bullshit
I don’t trust anyone who uses “ephebophilia” outside of academic texts, “hebephilia” is instant re-education camp