• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wow, you’re starting to get it, maybe we should start doing something about it instead of defending those who profit, right?

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If there was no method by which people could ever profit from a system like Steam, why bother building it?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s a difference between making profit and becoming one of the richest person in the world, in the second case it means you clearly made too much profit by selling for a higher price than required.

    • RandomException@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      What would be the solution here that could drive the prices down? Limit profit levels per company?

      I feel like it’s not even capitalism itself being the problem alone, but also the entry cost for all these services. Building a competitor to Steam is pretty much equal to building a competitor to Youtube which means it’s almost impossible due to the running costs of the service AND you would have to be somehow wildly better as in not gather as much money from your customers. It would be lovely to see some resolution to these problems without going full communism first.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nothing really. Publishers already all want to go up to 70 base price, and most bigger games already effectively cost 100-200 between pre-orders, deluxe editions and mtx (I don’t know the designed price point, but years ago I was talking to the team of an in-dev game who planned for 110 being spent on average per buyer for their game).