And why do you use them?

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Valve has put a lot of work into helping WINE & Linux. Even if it was a selfish play to break free from Microsoft & other app stores to lock those into their marketplace fee, I can’t help but be grateful for the better ecosystem & uptick in users. Since they are privately held too, they aren’t in the same business of chasing quartely profits or making the experience worse & worse by selling your data & slapping ads everywhere.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I won’t say it’s “best”, as I just want to run a game without friendlists and other bloat, so I really hate the fact Steam is nessesary for so many games.

      But I would call it “essentiall”.

    • yala@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup, as time went on, I simply felt less need to have proprietary software on my system. Steam remains as an exception; simply by virtue of having no F(L)OSS alternative (AFAIK).

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Steam itself isn’t that special and things like Heroic exist but where Steam wins is the ecosystem. Also Valve sponsor developments of Linux desktop technologies, so even if Steam itself is proprietary, some of the money ends up advancing open source.

    • Lantern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Was going to say this. Pycharm is probably the only paid software I use. With that being said, students don’t need to pay for it, so I don’t have to worry about that.

  • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    DaVinci Resolve is THE video editor on Linux. Unfortunately the libre apps for it don’t get even close, to the point that even with all the limitations in the free and paid versions, it still is the best option.

    Also shout out to Bitwig Studio, although I don’t use it.

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        KDEnLive is a good “editor” for simpler projects, but not a good video editing “suite”. It comes nowhere near Resolve’s color grading ability, or even audio editing ability these days. And it has no compositing ability at all. In fact, except Natron on Linux (that gets updated once every 2-3 years with just bug fixes and not many features), there’s nothing about compositing. Blender’s compositing is unusable btw.

      • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I see it has two different products for two different use cases. Kdenlive is for those who missed Windows Movie maker or iMovie. Something to stitch together videos, or split apart videos.

        DaVinci Resolve is for those who need stable professional software like adobe.

        Not saying that kdenlive can’t be used professionally but I found its stability lacking, its tools unpolished and its functionality limited. The only benefit is that it can handle aac audio, and export it too thanks to ffmpeg.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Honestly IMO it’s not even a comparison whatsoever. Kdenlive cannot be used professionally for any real work, it will just crash on you before you even find out it can’t even do what you want. I’ve tried it off and on for many years and it’s always a massive disappointment compared to pro solutions.

      • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It is, but when it comes to more complex needs, it falls short. It is really good for simpler editing needs and it is getting better fast.

    • Gamma@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Can you run it on anything besides cent yet? I tried it a few years ago and it fell flat on its face

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Reaper. Great usability and decent Linux support out of the box (looking at you, davinci resolve). Generous free trial and a cheap one-time payment for a license. LMMS has served me well and is fine for basic stuff, but reaper is a whole other level, both in features and usability. I’ve heard good things about ardour too but have yet to give it a try.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Lightburn for controlling laser engravers.

    It’s pretty much the only choice on Linux (though it is cross platform). Free 30 day trial, then ~$80 lifetime licence.

    The other choice is LaserGRBL, which is open source, but doesn’t seem to have a Linux port for some reason. And it has a lot fewer features, with a more complex workflow.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    gitkraken has a lot of features that I never use. But showing the various branches and their connections as a color-coded tree is worth paying money for.

  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does it count as paid if I donated what I think is a reasonable price?
    Cause then it’s KDE, Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice and Gimp. I’d prefer those programs even if their proprietary counterparts were free.

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Came here to say this too… I contribute a few €/£/$ per month to various projects…

      I won’t get all righteous here, but just because you don’t have to pay, doesn’t mean you to say you can’t support the developer(s)…

  • pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    OpenAudible - because Audible cycles books in and out of the membership too fast and sometimes their phone app sucks.

    • Shertson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agreed, OpenAudible is fantastic. I’ve been an audible member for ages. I really only listen to my books when commuting and traveling and the pandemic set me back in my listening. Using OpenAudible allows me to keep my library available on any device and use any application to listen.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Half-life: Alyx, Baldur’s Gate 3, Elden Ring, … you get the idea. It’s not so much those apps per se, and I’d prefer them to be FLOSS too, rather it’s the amazing content and in such rare cases, I’m happy to financially support the creators.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What aren’t you happy to financially support creators of open source software you like?

    • ffhein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have some hobby projects in Python but I’ve never needed the pro features, I do pay for Clion though

    • 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s so odd how proprietary software is frowned upon so much in this community, but no one cares when it comes to gaming.

      • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It is a bit different. Have you invested thousands of hours developing skills with a piece of productivity software, and locked your data into their proprietary data format? Has that vendor looked at your investment, and found that they have plenty of leverage to turn the screws on you?

        With a game, you invest tens of hours developing skills, lock your “master sword” in a proprietary save format, and then you save the princess. After that, you’re done. It is an ephemeral experience, give or take wanting to replay a few really good games. The game vendor doesn’t have that much hold over you, and their grip doesn’t get stronger the more you use it. I can replace your game with hundreds of other games, and I don’t really lose anything by doing so.

        • 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I absolutely agree with you, but look at launchers and such. Steam is very much proprietary and commercial. I find it a little odd that those who might do anything to avoid proprietary software, willingly use it for gaming.

          Those are just my thoughts.