• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, due to Earth constantly moving you’ll end up in space

    -Physics

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re just knowledgeable enough to know that Earth moves, but not intelligent enough to know that there’s no absolute reference frame it moves in respect to.

      If you don’t continue travelling with the Earth along its path when you time travel, you could literally end up at any random point in the universe, unless you pick a different, arbitrary, body to move in reference to.

      • dovahking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        But the universe is also constantly expanding. So the frame of reference becomes obsolete because it’s at an entirely different point in space now.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then there’s you who forgot that we actually do have a universal reference frame with the cosmic microwave background.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The CMB is everywhere, and anywhere in the universe it’s the same distance from a hypothetical observer. I fail to see how you can use it as an absolute reference frame.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah, I know the thing with reference points, but that’s a matter of navigation and relativity.

        In reality, a point in space is a point in space, like, a specific “pixel” of the Universe (oversimplified) that might be occupied with something or not.

        We just can’t anchor this point since we don’t know what reference is absolute and the laws of physics can be applied to every inertial reference, so this doesn’t help.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not that we don’t know which reference point is absolute, but there are still absolutely defined ‘points in space’, it’s that there is no absolute reference point, and so there are just ‘points in space’ relative to whatever arbitrary body you decide to make your reference frame.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        hey I invented time travel, but there’s one thing I can’t figure out… how do you travel in space?

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      People say this but the reality is that you are already traveling through time and you aren’t teleporting into the space where the Earth used to be. Just as traveling backward would essentially just reverse that process. i.e unless you specifically design a time travel device to kill you that way, thats not how time travel works.

      • I think a time travel device would, itself, need to be a spaceship anyway. And since it would have to travel FTL to achieve time travel in the first place, getting back to where Earth is at that point in time shouldn’t be difficult.