• Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      More like lots of having to refute dumb arguments that imply choosing harm reduction is the same thing as endorsing harm.

      • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        “harm reduction” in the context of genocide is absolutely wild. It’s a genocide, not a heroin habit

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I want no genocide. My choices are: vote for a candidate that would make the genocide worse, while complaining they’re supporting a genocide, or vote for a candidate that would more or less do nothing about it, while complaining they’re ineffectual at stopping the genocide.

          How can you not see one of those two options is better?

          • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Biden isnt “doing nothing”, he’s actively making it worse. He is directly complicit. How do you not see this?

            • Liz@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Okay, does that actually change the choice you make? You only have two practical options when it comes to voting.

          • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That genocide supporter oughta Genocide Biden and the other do nothing one oughta Peaceful Trump I see.