What is this? Some sort of ‘protect the children because they’re totally not using apples and soda cans’ bullshit?

Why is this in any way necessary or even useful?

Edit: Just discovered this was about tobacco, making this even stupider since this product isn’t for tobacco, it’s for cannabis. https://dclcorp.com/blog/news/pact-act-impacts-vape-industry/

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    Now you’re being dishonest. You have no idea what “and related products” means, you’re just guessing. I’m not even sure how cannabis is related to tobacco.

    That is not evidence to support your claim.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      1 year ago

      Is tobacco illegal to sell to minors?

      Is cannabis illegal to sell to minors?

      If the answer to both of these questions are yes, and you are still arguing, you need to seriously re-read cannabis and tobacco laws….

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        Again, that is not evidence that PACT was intended to restrict minors from using cannabis. It doesn’t sound like you have evidence.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          ……

          Do you seriously want them to make a second law when tobacco already covers the sale to minor part? I’m sure most other people can draw this parallel…

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            01·
            1 year ago

            I understand this is your opinion. Opinions are not evidence. And yes, laws are supposed to be very precise, especially when dealing with commerce.