• Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m surprised something like this was even allowed to be patented. That’s a super broad category. I thought you could only patent actual systems and not the theory on how that system works

  • Ilflish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    So reading this, the patent isn’t for an accessibility option to reduce the amount of dialogue by somethin like a necessity level but by in dialogue allowing you to pick an arbitrary option of say “get to the point” which is a lot worse than I was hoping

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course they’ve patented it. Are they going to patent volume sliders next? Fuck off, Sony.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbf, it only makes good business sense to try and patent everything you can. Either to hold it as a unique selling point over competitors or to license to others.

      I think the real problem here is the concepts of patents in general.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m okay with patents in general, just not software patents, and other patents should be much shorter.

        The original point was to encourage sharing of ideas in exchange for protection while you bring it to market. But it’s mostly just weaponized at this point.

        I’m thinking something like 5 years for most patents, with a one time extension of you can prove you need more time to bring it to market or establish first mover advantage (so 5 years from release or from expiry, whichever happens first).