• tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The most annoying thing is that carmakers didn’t move to touchscreen-only because people want it, they’re doing it because it saves them money to ditch physical controls.

    “Hey the touchscreen is already here, may as well just put everything on it!”

    Yeah how about don’t. It’s such a pain having to fumble for things like climate control that used to just be a knob.

    The ideal situation is having both.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Our newest company car has volume touch-buttons.
      Lovely if you need to quickly silence the radio/media while driving 120kph on the highway =).
      But god forbid looking at the phone while standing still at a red light with a running/activated motor.

      • RandomLegend [He/Him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        My Peugeot e208 has both of them parallel to each other and that was the main reason i decided for that car instead of something like a tesla.

        There is no way i’ll be tapping through some iOS like app interface to change the temperature while going 150km/h on the highway…

        • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          With a Tesla, you wouldn’t have any problem like that. Just tap while going 220 km/h, problem solved.

            • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just wanted to be helpful and suggest how to avoid tapping on a touch screen while going 150 km/h on the highway. Crashing is an option too, but I was told it has certain side effects.

              By the way, I H A T E Tesla and touch screens in cars.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Touchscreen can be a positive because you get dynamic and contextual menus, and the sort of rich user interface that people expect from modern devices.

        But for the most common functions, nothing beats the tactile muscle memory of physical controls that are always immediately present when you need them, and can use with your eyes still on the road.

        So the best is to have both.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Radio is fine for touch control imo

      Hazards and climate control should be physical buttons though.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        A radio needs to be able to do two things: Rotate for volume and press for muting.

        A dial button is not that hard to implement.
        Plus it can work as a on/off switch.

    • SecretPancake@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think even more annoying are touch buttons on the steering wheel. It’s easy to just accidentally activate something with a light touch while steering. And when you do want to push it, it doesn’t work consistently. Mine even has different inputs depending on how long you touch it. I’ve heard that VW has the learned the lesson and will introduce real buttons again but apparently it takes a few years to change this simple thing in a car production even though they’ve been doing it in the past for many years.