What to say to people who say this kinda of thing? Usually I just say “ok then”

  • Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    Some variation of the below:

    Can I have your phone with the messaging apps unlocked?

    Can I log into your personal email?

    Can I see your tax returns?

    Can I set up cameras and microphones in your house?

    Can I place a GPS tracker on your car?

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      It also works with opening up the info to anyone, not just you. That’s one of the key issues, even if a trusted party is accessing the info there’s a chance that a malicious party can get access too. Or the trusted party becomes malicious later (government changes, company changes hands, etc.)

      People generally don’t want everything in their home live streamed 24/7. If anything it has the potential for abuse, like if someone knows when you’ll be out of home for a few hours

    • AItoothbrush
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Insurance companies in some countries give you a discount if you agree to put a tracker on your car…

    • @wincing_nucleus073@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      even blatant violations dont matter, they will still use and do the same things without caring, that’s the fucked up part lol. I’ve seen this so many times.

  • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    “Okay, then hand me your phone unlocked and give me as much time as I want to poke around your browser history, files, and photos.”

  • @navi@lemmy.tespia.org
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Medical privacy is a great example.

    Consider a situation like Texas right now where abortion went from a normal, legal thing to something that you can be fined and jailed for.

    Would such a person be OK with the state having access to their medical records so they could jail or fine them?

    People need to understand that much of privacy precautions are “layers” of security against “what if” scenarios that can sometimes be very real.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I take out a pad and pen, “what’s your bank credentials? Also, your [social media] credentials? I won’t use it against you. Promise. … No? I thought you have nothing to hide?” I put the pad away, and hold out my hand, “let me see you phone. I want to look through your pictures and internet history. … No again? Huh. I guess you do care about privacy.”

  • Depends on the person, but sometimes things such as:

    “Is there anything you do, watch, listen to, say or have done in the past, which is currently illegal in another country?”

    “Did you see how in the US, some states have just recently made abortion illegal, and in others, you can get in trouble with the police for wearing clothes which they don’t think match your birth gender? Both things were perfectly legal a few years ago”

    “Imagine it’s 2024 and mandateless unelected UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak says model railways are offensive to motorists, so they’ve banned them”

    “Do you think Facebook’s going to defend your privacy when the government makes model railways illegal, Dad?” :P

  • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    So unlock your phone and let me give it to the next stranger I encounter, matter of fact, why do you have a pin enabled in the first place ?!!

  • @root@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I would offer a suggestion “it’s not that I have nothing to hide; it’s that i have nothing i want you or anyone else to see”.

    Both may sound similar but in reality quite diffierent.

  • That’s a choice they can make for themselves, not a choice tech companies and governments should make for everyone. If they want to trade their privacy, and I don’t - fine. All I want is the power to choose and know that choice will be respected.

    • @LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      This is a good answer for if you’re talking to somebody who is there in good faith / you already respect. “I disagree with you but you don’t have to adopt my worldview as long as I’m not forced to do stuff I don’t want” isn’t bad.

      • If they’re not arguing in good faith my advice is don’t argue. Don’t roll around with pigs - you just get covered in shit and the pigs like it.

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I usually ask them to hand me their phone while its unlocked and that really makes some people think. Its funny because at the same time i have so little to hide that the only reason i have a passeord on my phone is because it makes stealing it harder. But im not gonna hand my data some random company just to watch braindead 30 second videos.

  • @itsprobablyfine@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Well if you live in a democracy you should. It’s not about your data alone, its everyone else’s. It’s social media company XYZ determining how each individual is going to vote, then, on election day sending all people on one side get out and vote messages, and sending people on the other side a tsunami of unrelated bs to make sure they don’t know about the election. Or push a bunch of fakenews to make them feel both sides are the same and why even vote?

    Do this in a couple key areas and you only need to hit a few tens of thousands of people to turn a presidential race.

    We know it can be done because it already has been. If you live in a democracy you should care a good deal about privacy, even if you somehow have nothing to hide

    • PupBiru
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      a healthy democracy requires others to have privacy. people like investigative journalists need to be able to blend in with the crowd and expose government wrongdoing

      blending in the the crowd is the important part: if everyone cares about privacy, nobody sticks out for caring about privacy… but if nobody cares about privacy, the investigative journalist suddenly looks really obvious and can be targeted much more easily

      if someone doesn’t think they have anything to hide, that’s fine (wrong, but fine) however they can help to make sure the government acts appropriately simply by not splashing data around everywhere for all to see