produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agothe land of the f...discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down10
arrow-up145arrow-down1imagethe land of the f...discuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareRooskie91@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoAh yes, 2,313 people, otherwise known as a representative sample 350 million.
minus-squarespace_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago2000 can absolutely be a representative sample size. The bigger worry here is sampling bias rather than sample size.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t believe this is a representative sample, but not because of the sample size. Stay in your lane, high school level science education.
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago🙄 This fucking comment on every single poll result. Consider learning even the tiniest bit about how statistical sampling works.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIt appears to be an online poll which wouldn’t have proper sampling
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThat’s a vastly better critique than just whining about the sample size.
Ah yes, 2,313 people, otherwise known as a representative sample 350 million.
2000 can absolutely be a representative sample size. The bigger worry here is sampling bias rather than sample size.
I don’t believe this is a representative sample, but not because of the sample size. Stay in your lane, high school level science education.
🙄
This fucking comment on every single poll result. Consider learning even the tiniest bit about how statistical sampling works.
It appears to be an online poll which wouldn’t have proper sampling
That’s a vastly better critique than just whining about the sample size.