• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given all the different ways “active” is defined we may as well just collect all the meanings available.

      Mastodon and Twitter etc, for example, count logging on as active.

      While I can see the argument for voting, it is qualitatively different from posting/commenting. Knowing both, as well as log in numbers too might make sense. But muddying the waters is probably confusing … though it is interesting that any instance can define what it means by “active”.

      • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say that voting isn’t actually different from posting/commenting. It’s a process whereby a user takes part in a discussion/topic/post. In an ideal world, everyone would post, but we shouldn’t act like active people who don’t feel like they have anything to say explicitly, aren’t here.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, that could be it. I would like other instances to do the same, to me ama voting lurker is an active user

      • syd@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely. Other social media platforms count as active when we mistakenly enter their sites :)