I’m a little bit underwhelmed, I thought that based off the fact so many people seem to make using this distro their personality I expected… well, more I guess?

Once the basic stuff is set-up, like wifi, a few basic packages, a desktop environment/window manager, and a bit of desktop environment and terminal customisation, then that’s it. Nothing special, just a Linux distribution with less default programs and occasionally having to look up how to install a hardware driver or something if you need to use bluetooth for the first time or something like that.

Am I missing something? How can I make using Arch Linux my personality when once it’s set up it’s just like any other computer?

What exactly is it that people obsess over? The desktop environment and terminal customisation? Setting up NetworkManager with nmcli? Using Vim to edit a .conf file?

  • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0•5 months ago

    So what you’re saying is that the package manager is very different?

    My point stands - once things are installed your “Linux Experience” is pretty similar.

    NOTE: I’ve used words like “most” and “similar” and “pretty”. Do not ignore these words. They have meaning.

    • @folaht@lemmy.ml
      1•5 months ago

      I would say it’s not very different, just one league above all the others.
      Same goes for their wiki, but not for their community forum,
      unless unfriendliness and strictness also counts as a plus.

        • @folaht@lemmy.ml
          1•4 months ago

          I use Manjaro and little bit of Artix.
          If I would recommend anything, it’s either EndeavourOS or Manjaro.

          I stopped using Arch because I got banned from their forum for changing my username.