• @Plswrk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can maneuver all you want, it is spyware. My hobby work is free. I don’t track my users nor do I inundate them with ads. I believe that’s unethical.

      My work work is not available for free in any capacity whatsoever.

      • @drekly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Good job you’re not using an android phone so it doesn’t matter!

        It’s his full time job, so his "work work " isn’t free in any capacity either, you either pay with ad revenue or you pay with $20

        • @Plswrk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He chose to go down that path. No one forced him. It’s a brain dead argument mate.

          Oh and btw, it is free in some capacity. You do not have to pay to use the free version. It’s literally called the fucking free version.

          • @drekly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            The free version with ads that pay the developer that everyone’s losing their minds over like they’ve never seen an advert before.

            • @Plswrk@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Rightfully so, because it tracks you, collects and sells your data and inundates you with ads, which is literally every single fucking thing lemmy was built to get around.

              • @drekly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                Or is it just a continuation of the usual Google platform. Being used on a Google phone with a Google account.

    • Catweazle
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      @drekly @Plswrk, nobody needs to work for free, but creating incommings by spying the user to sell his data to third party isn’t an acceptable way to gain money. There are a lot of methodes to gain money in the network, but with surveillance advertising spyware is the worse and with big risks for the user, which can’t control where his personal data ends up.

        • Catweazle
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          @drekly, simple ads are not a problem, if they are based on the content of the page and not based on user logs. Ads as is only can be somewhat annoying if there a lot in the page or they appears in the middle of a concert in YT, but no are a risk for the user privacy, no more than a commercial poster in the street or an ad in TV. As with all, bad the abuse. Years ago you saw 1-2 banners in a page, but novadays you must seek the webcontent between advertisings, banners, cookieadvices and popups

            • Catweazle
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              @drekly, no ok, blocking trackers is legit selfdefense, but also the abuse of ads, blocking these also is needed. Only it isn’t a problem when a web shows an banner image or two, this can be tolerated, but not the abuse of ads currently and annoying popups, it is legit to block this crap.

                • Catweazle
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  @drekly, I don’t use any third party client for social networks, less a proprietary paid one. It’s like using a privacy browser, using Google as search engine. There are enough Spyware in the mobile which make trouble to eliminate, no need to install more.

                  But each one that makes him happy