That is one of the many problems, yes.

OMG I’m dying, its like having a half ton dog.

It is likely that they don’t already have a way to exclude certain numbers from the report and block feather yet, but will implement one if the number of people blocking it gets too high.

So yeah, if you ignore the parts that make it more complicated it seems easier!

If it is windy, it is far more complicated than driving on the road, especially in cities with taller buildings. Like not crashing into buildings is far harder than applying the brakes when there is ever changing wind shear that you can’t see. This applies to most days in most cities.

we are only 2 years away from artemis 3

Lol. We are at least three years from Artemis 3 at a minimum. More likely at least 10 even if the government doesn’t collapse.

The dome makes no practical sense on Earth.

Doesn’t matter how good thing have gotten when you choose to be cheap and use the wrong stuff.

Same thing with their leaking displays because they ignored the extreme heat minimums real car manufacturers used.

You’re right, that is annoying!

If you ignore take off and landing, birds, weather conditions, and everything else that makes flying more complex and dangerous than driving on the ground, sure.

You would have a point if the flying car didn’t have to take into account the wind, updrafts, downdrafts, wind sheer off buildings, and a ton of other flying related stuff that helicopter pilots need to take into account which are barely noticeable to cars the majority of the time.

Then there is landing, the most dangerous part of flying. Imagine if the emergency braking in a csr needed to stop the car without spilling a liquid from an open cup.

Being on the ground is far less complex than flying, otherwise getting a pilot’s license would be easier than a driver’s permit.

The alternative is autonomous AI trafficked flying cars that is networked with all commercial drone traffic, but that is 5-10 years away from being reliable and possible.

50-100 years is more likely. The complexity of automated low altitude flight is exponentially more complex than driving on the ground.

You are 100% correct that helicopters and their issues are the exact reason why flying cars are a terrible idea for the general population. I even like to point them out as the same thing when people talk about flying cars. There are some technical differences between people’s image of a flying car, which is closer to a drone with the multiple lift producing drives than a singular giant spinning blade, although the little ones would be comparably dangerous in a crash.

That said, helicopters aren’t flying cars because you can’t drive them around on the ground. Which means this product is a helicopter, not a flying car.

current

Dunno if that counts as an action movie, but she is wrong because there were a number of action movies with one or more women as leads in the 70s and 80s. They were B movies, but still movies!

By the next election her voters will only rememeber her ‘standing up for them’ and not that she pushed for it to happen to them in the first place.

Unless I think having the signal on would confuse other drivers, yes.

Using a signal in some multilane turn only lanes would make it unclear if I was merging into the next lane or using the current lane to turn, so I don’t use it too early if it seems like it would be confusing. I do turn it on close to the intersection to indicate that I know that it is a turn lane.

I also don’t use it for exit only lanes if there is a long lane to get there. If it is short like a turn lane then I do to make it clear know it is an exit/turn.

Why would the steps be literal when everything else is bullshit? Obviously the reasoning steps are AI slop too.

No rush, I assume they are dead.

If this is In Deep Geek his other ones are entertaing and this is one I will watch eventually. Chuckle at the title each time I see it.

I love hearing that there is a singular American accent when every place I visit in the US has a different accent, some of which are a struggle to understand.

Any country has a massive number of accents, especially the larger and more populated they are.

The big thing here is that ‘polite’ words are being singled out as extraneous when there are tons of extraneous words being used. The focus is on words that make it seem like AI has feelings or intent.

There is no reason to filter any words, because the entire point of LLMs is to take inefficient human communication and do stuff with it. ‘Please’ isn’t any more of a waste that ‘the’ or including a period at the end of a sentence.

Not to mention the fact that the whole thing is so horribly inefficient that ‘extra’ words cost millions of dollars to process. Holy shit that is terrible design.