This meme is from 2004. History repeats itself.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If civilians are civilians…

      "Amongst Israelis, 69% of those killed were civilians and 31% members of the IDF. The number of Israeli civilians killed, from attacks by Palestinian armed groups or individuals, has declined steadily, peaking in 2002 at an average of 22 deaths per month, and dropping markedly to an average of one civilian per month in 2007. 6/

      In contrast to Israeli figures, however, Palestinian civilian fatalities have remained high. Palestinian civilians, killed by Israeli security forces, peaked with an average of 35 deaths per month in 2002, and again in 2004. In 2007 they dropped slightly to an average of ten civilian deaths per month."

      https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-208380/

      Both sides kill civilians with abandon, and Israel is markedly better at it. Major media doesn’t seem to care very much about Palestinian civilians though.

  • Anamana@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m mostly pro Palestine, but using this picture with the subtitle ‘history repeats itself’ and therefore portraying what happened at the festival, and the other slaughter missions as a tiny goofy missile, feels kinda disproportionate. Don’t you think?

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No. Hundreds of thousands will die in response to hundreds dying. The comic is still fully accurate even if “a single missile” is still condemnable.

    • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “history repeats itself” as in the people who only condemn needless killing when Hamas does it, but ignore the Palestinian cause the rest of the time.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s almost like motivation, methods, intentions, and circumstances matter and not just body count. For example, intentionally targeting civilians to maximize civilian deaths is not the same as accidentally killing civilians with collateral damage while trying to minimize civilian deaths.

    • istdaslol@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is nothing new. Often the actions of Israel are portrayed in the worst way possible. As a quick example: The UN considers everyone under 18 a child, hamas starts recruiting at 14. When the IDF does a raid and kills one of these members the Arab media screams „Isreal has slaughtered children“

      This is why I switched to being more pro Israel

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Palestinians do not have consistent access to clean water, no I don’t think they have consistent access to condoms.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Palestinian women are not having lots of children because they don’t know about contraception, or can’t access contraception,” says Sara Randall, an anthropologist at University College London, who co-authored the 2006 investigation. “So one has to conclude that they actually want lots of children.” source

            • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              FYI links to her study, about Demography, not access to contraception - lead to a 404 page.

              Here’s a prrtty informal survey about Gazan access to contraception, it sort of suggests they have, like I said, inconsistent access to contraception.

              https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31856794/

              The article you linked to makes many excellent points. When you’re poor, bored, and chock full of bombing-induced PTSD, having many kids is seen as a good idea.

  • DoubleOwl7777@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    both sides are stupid. youd think after all these years of fighting a compromise could be found, but NO, they just always fight. gives me the feeling that they dont want it any other way.

    • addys@lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt that you will be swayed by facts, but just for the record: in 2000 Israel offered Hamas to become a fully sovereign nation on 100% of Gaza’s territory (and 95% of the West Bank) with East Jerusalem as their capital. Hamas declined. In 2005 Israel voluntarily disengaged from Gaza and enabled self-rule, hoping this would be a step towards peace. It wasn’t. In 2011 there was another offer for a “two states for two peoples” solution, Hamas once again rejected it.

      None of this is surprising since the Hamas is a fanatic Muslim group following the most militant tenets of Islam. Their publicly-stated charter is to utterly destroy Israel (“drive the jews into the sea”) and create a Muslim nation on the entire area of Palestine. So anything less than that is a non-starter. Any Jew left alive in Israel means that they haven’t finished yet.

      Note that there’s nothing in the charter about the Palestinian people - The Hamas takes no civic or sovereign responsibility for the population which they govern. In other words, Hamas sees the Palestinian people as a consumable resource in their fight to bring Islam to 100% of the territory historically referred to as “Palestine”. So building tunnels under schools and hospitals is allowed. Diverting humanitarian aid to the military infrastructure while the population starves is fine. Indoctrinating children from kindergarten about the glory of killing Jews is standard procedure. etc. Using the Gaza residents as human shields is valuable both for reducing Hamas casualties as well as increasing collateral damage which makes Israel “look bad” in the international community.

      Compromise is difficult because when negotiating with someone who wants you dead, how do you meet them halfway ?

      • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why agree to this “compromise” when Israel violated the previous one?

        Drive the vast majority of a population from their homes, and to a tiny strip of their former homeland, then “generously” offer them to just remain there in their little concentration camp. And not even guaranteed, given Israel’s history. Gee, I wonder why they rejected?

        It’s not surprising that this is what occupiers think is “compromise”.

      • BaldProphet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Go further back, even. The UN Partition Plan for Palestine in 1947 would have given Palestine its own territory, splitting it with Israel 45/55. The Arab League and Arab Higher Committee of Palestine both rejected it.

        It’s not like compromises have never been offered. The Arabs have simply never been willing to accept anything less than the expulsion of the Jews from the territory.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          From their perspective, someone just moved into their house one day and when they objected they said “let’s compromise, you can keep half of the house.” No wonder they rejected that compromise.

          Unfortunately we’re now a couple of generations past that initial event so it’s a lot more complicated at this point.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            At this rate they shall soon have no house at all. Constant terror attacks against an undefeatable enemy and an unwillingness to compromise will ensure it.

        • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Palestinians are not saying to expel Jews. They are saying to remove the ethnoreligious state, not the Jews themselves.

          This was reiterated countless of times. They seek a Democratic state where Jews and non jews can be equal.

          • BaldProphet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry, I was wrong. They want to “obliterate” the Jews, not expel them. When talking about genocide, it’s important to specify the correct flavor.

            https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

            Regardless, they have multiple times rejected concessions and compromises that would have enabled them to have an independent democratic nation. If that’s truly what they wanted, why would they always pass on the opportunity to get it without bloodshed?

  • istdaslol@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    One site is kidnapping children and senior citizens, raping them und displaying them in public. The other is demolishing buildings, where a terror organisation is hiding, with a 3h notice.

    No offence but you fell for pollywood

    • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah , the usual pro-israel talk.

      I can show you countless evidence of Isreal doing worse several times in the past but people like you don’t care and never will.

      • istdaslol@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same goes for you, you won’t accept, that israel maybe isn’t as bad as it’s made to be

        • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I saw enough dead child, women and men from the Israeli strikes on schools , hospitals and homes. The horrible hunting screams of fathers and mothers after loosing their children. The empty stare of the sole surviving childs and the ones holding their toddler sibling near the rubbles of their destroyed home, standing not far from the decapitated body of their mother. I saw it happens many and many times before. The expression “it’s a complicated situation” being etched in my mind as I read the responses feeling helpless that the worst crimes can be tossed behind these words. It’s not about accepting Isreal it’s seeing the atrocities they’ve committed countless times before remaining unpunished, disgustingly cheered and applauded many times.

          But It’s okey. Humans will destroy themselves sooner or later and these atrocities will forcefully stop.

          • istdaslol@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The difference is, hamas attacks out of hatred towards Israel and Israel attacks to destroy outposts of a terror organisation. Hamas intentional uses hospitals and schools as an outpost to use as a propaganda tool.

            I agree civilian casualties are always bad, but you have to accept that Hamas has the goal to maximise them, even on the Gaza side - otherwise they would loose support.

            • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The claim That their freedom fighters are categorized by us and our friends as terrorists will never work on me. The Ukrainian resistance aren’t called terrorists, the french resistance during ww2 weren’t called terrorists. Hamas are like them freedom fighters and the atrocities they commit mirrors that of the aggressor. Among hamas are the sole children left after an Israeli strike, the crazed fathers that lost their families. They want freedom and they fight for it !

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The Ukrainian resistance aren’t called terrorists, the french resistance during ww2 weren’t called terrorists.

                That’s probably because neither of those groups exhibited the mediaeval barbarity against civilians Hamas has been celebrating.

                Hamas are like them freedom fighters and the atrocities they commit mirrors that of the aggressor.

                Hamas is explicitly calling for genocide. “The aggressor,” is not. Israel goes to great lengths to minimize civilian deaths, even notifying targets of incoming airstrikes before they hit.

                If you think these actions are morally equivalent your moral compass is broken. One side is trying to defend themselves and the other side is trying to eradicate every member of their opponent’s society.

                They want freedom and they fight for it !

                Perhaps they should negotiate for it rather than continually provoking an enemy they cannot defeat militarily and hiding among civilians. That would prevent many needless civilian casualties.

  • jcdenton@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whenever Israel says their gonna bomb a place to let civilians leave, the Hamas make the civilians stay so they get killed along with them. The Hamas are monsters