• Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you are wondering why, she said this, it’s part of a pattern of spreading misinformation about abortions that has been happening as long as people want to keep other people from having them.

    The goal is to scare vulnerable women away from the resources that can help them and to make it easier to prosecute anyone who has been found to help them by conflating them with drug dealers.

    It adds to the cloud of confusion that desperate women must cut through in order to gain access to the resources they need, and for some of those women, it will push the window out too far for them to have an abortion that they can afford, or cause them to give up, and just have the baby they don’t want, damn the costs.

    Since they see this as saving a baby’s life, they don’t have any ethical issues whatsoever with lying like this.

  • kreynen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The legal representation of the voting machine companies are a box of pupies compared to the big pharma lawyers. IANAL, but this sounds like textbook defamation.

  • gowan@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hopefully the manufacturers of mifepristone and misoprostol, Danco and Pfizer respectively, sue the ever loving shit out if this woman.