Congressional Republicans have for months repeatedly written to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland demanding he appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden, the president’s son, over his business dealings.
Some even demanded that a specific man be named to lead the inquiry: David C. Weiss, the Trump-appointed Delaware U.S. attorney who has long investigated the case.
But on Friday, after Mr. Garland elevated Mr. Weiss to special counsel status, Republicans in Congress reacted publicly not with triumph, but with outrage. “David Weiss can’t be trusted and this is just a new way to whitewash the Biden family’s corruption,” Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee wrote on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.
The reaction was a notable political development, one that underscored both how Mr. Weiss, a Republican, has fallen in conservative circles, and how deeply it has become ingrained in the G.O.P. to oppose the Justice Department at every turn.
“The reality is this appointment is meant to distract from, and slow down, our investigations,” said Representative Jason Smith, Republican of Missouri and chairman of Ways and Means, one of three congressional committees looking into the Biden family’s finances.
…
Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa, who had once called for Mr. Weiss to be made special counsel, said he no longer stands by that belief. “Given the underhanded plea deal negotiated by the U.S. attorney from President Biden’s home state, it’s clear Mr. Weiss isn’t the right person for the job,” Mr. Grassley said.
But Democrat-aligned groups saw something else in the Republicans’ about-face: disingenuousness.
“House Republicans’ opposition to Trump appointee David Weiss’s appointment as special counsel is nothing more than another political stunt,” said Kyle Herrig, the director of the Congressional Integrity Project, an advocacy group that defends President Biden from congressional investigations. “After months of calling for this, their dismay makes clear that they will stop at nothing to weaponize Congress to interfere with an ongoing investigation and harm Joe Biden.”
Because they don’t ACTUALLY want an investigation, or facts, or god forbid an exoneration.
They just want to keep talking nonsense until the election. It’s Benghazi all over again.
They saw what happened when they got their way with abortion.
They don’t want the noise, not the signal.
This makes perfect sense when you start from the premise that “everything a Democrat does is wrong.” Merrick Garland, AG under the Biden administration (even though there is a strong separation between the Justice Dept and the rest of the executive branch), and Obama’s SCOTUS nominee (even though he was blocked by McConnell), made the appointment. Therefore, the appointment is wrong.
it makes sense when you start from the premise that republicans are self-serving liars and bullies who will claim victimhood no matter the circumstances in an attempt to villainize their opponents against whom they have no real, substantive arguments.
hell, even in 2016, when Trump won the election, he still claimed that it was rigged!
deleted by creator
They also can’t complain about him not having special counsel status any more. It hurts the sideshow they want to kick up in the media.
Even more important, they now know that this investigation will probably be handled quickly and uneventfully, undermining everything they’ve been squawking about for the past couple years.
Reminds me of the Key and Peele sketch about Obama meeting with the GOP.
I love this. I tuned in to a little Sean Hannity on the radio on my drive home Friday and heard him rail against the selection of Weiss multiple times, while throwing out vague bullet points about why he’s unacceptable.
My first reaction was that they’re laying the groundwork for when this investigation comes up with nothing, or some really boring crimes (like firearms charges? The Republicans are about gun control now?) and they have to lay the blame on someone so the conspiracy machine can keep pumping out outrage.
Knowing this is a guy they wanted for the job until he started doing it makes it even more delicious, but as we know when Republican’s beliefs come up against reality it’s the reality that gives, so they’ll have no problem ignoring that this was even ever a thing.
They can’t removed about there not being one now
I’m genuinely curious what you genuinely thought was a serious enough word to censor that fits this grammatical context
I actually didn’t sensor myself. I use Voyager and it seems to be censoring any profanity by default? Haven’t figured out how to disable it.
That makes way more sense lol. I was really confused by why someone would want to swear, but also believe censoring it is necessary
Ok, so apparently I can use the word fucking but not bitch?
It’s really fucking annoying, hah
