• takeda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 days ago

    It absolutely is. The way it looks, we will be lucky if US won’t outright back Russia.

    • guy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      This is something that worries me.
      I bet most Americans would go ‘Oh yeah Oceania and Eurasia has always been allies.’

    • SloganLessons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      A situation where Russia invades EU and US immediately after invades greenland, no longer looks so impossible to me

  • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    I think having our national armies more interconnected would be better than a federal army.

    I simply fear the risk of having a federal army being abused at some point to intervene in internal / national affairs of an EU country is too high. Yes we’re living without mass civil unrest right now, but think about future possibilities. Imagine a country would experience a revolution or fall into a civil war. The federal army could be deployed and there’s no guarantee it will support the right side.

    • SloganLessons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m under the impression that the idea of an unified EU army is that they would be able to act independently in case of an attack, no need for votes or bureaucracy.

      If that’s not the case, then yeah that’s a problem