• subignition@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    DOJ is really going at it lately.

    I can’t wait to hear about the outcome of this litigation in 20-25 years.

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Right?

      Going after Google AND Visa?!

      Even if it’s all theatrics, the Justice department hasn’t really showed up to work in recent memory and this is a refreshing change from the void abyss DOJ usually haunts

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The DOJ isn’t going after this, but VISA is also the source of all these fucking porn bans on like Tumblr and shit because if you want to be able to use their payment processing, you also have to follow their fucking puritan ass values.

    Honestly, if this kicks that secondary issue in its ass, that’s amazing.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I wonder what the world would be like if that IBM source code which is the backbone for all financial transactions and payment gateways weren’t tightly controlled proprietary tech.

    More fraud maybe, but less nickel and dime trickle upwards.

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    These network transactions cost between 2 to 4 % for merchants, which is a cost passed to consumers by businesses raising prices. That’s a fairly large “inflation”, and certainly it seems out of line with the effort they out into it. It’s anticompetitive practices that keep it in place.

    • noredcandy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fwiw debit card transaction are capped around 21 cents per transaction depending on the size of the bank holding the account. You’re right for credit cards though. Also, imho, I’ve never seen merchants pass along these debit card savings to the consumer. With they would though.

      • Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Whether they directly pass the costs or indirectly, these are still costs made by the seller. In other words either the costs are passed on by the credit card customers or simply all customers. Somebody has to pay for the costs and in the end the seller has to make some profit to survive.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Visa should be nationalized. Let the government run the payment processing if we are only going to have only one.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Christ…this needed to be major news a year ago. We really need to get banks out of the payment business but fear that they are pulling an Intuit and will make the FedNow system more challenging to use down the road.

    • paf0@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’d love to see the federal reserve issue a no fee stablecoin, though I wonder if it would be secure in the long term with quantum coming.

      • Doug7070@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I have the most incredible news for you about this crazy new thing called… cash.

        More seriously, there’s no reason government bodies shouldn’t just create a central digital transaction system with real money, instead of pouring resources into the stupidity of a blockchain system. Save everyone a lot of trouble and wasted compute cycles and just make the source of trust in the system the fact that it’s administrated by a trusted central authority running a database, instead of the various shell game wank of blockchain systems.