• Undearius
    link
    fedilink
    English
    653 months ago

    Family Sharing enables you to play games from other family members’ libraries, even if they are online playing another game.

    This is a great improvement to this feature. It’s refreshing when these type of convenience features are considered and implemented.

  • @lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    443 months ago

    If a family member gets banned for cheating while playing your copy of a game, you (the game owner) will also be banned in that game

    Hm… so if you don’t trust your kids to not do dumb things in games you also play then don’t share them

    • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      253 months ago

      As much as i don’t really like this there would have been a loophole where you use fake temporary family members to continue cheating.

      Back in the day some games also banned your homes external ip address which would have a similar effect.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 months ago

        Imagine moving to a new place and being banned because the last person who lived there cheated in the specific game you play lol.

        • fatalicus
          link
          fedilink
          103 months ago

          Ip address isn’t tied to the house, but the subscriber.

          But most ISP don’t have static Ip for private customers, so you experience just suddenly being banned because you received an Ip address someone got banned.

        • @Baku@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          I tried to sign up for a Facebook account (hate it, but market place seemed like my only option for something I was after) and had my account automatically banned on creation. Twice. They demanded photos of my face, which I begrudgingly gave them, and still never approved my account.

          I signed up for a new one with the exact same information from my mobile data plan instead and it worked fine, and I never got banned

  • MrGerrit
    link
    fedilink
    273 months ago

    Very handy. Been using it with my daughter and loves the amount of games she can choose from.

  • @_spiffy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    163 months ago

    This is a great feature! I can finally have both my kids play whatever game they want at the same time.

  • @inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    163 months ago

    Finally! Now I can switch back to the “normal” Steam Beta build for other experimental features, Steam Family was on a separate beta build which didn’t allow me to try other things…

    • @Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The family beta had weird issues on Linux (Gnome/Wayland) until recently too so I’m glad to see this getting a full release.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’ve been on it for a while (on Garuda, no Gnome) and it’s been stable. I don’t recall any issues. Maybe I just got lucky.

        • @Toribor@corndog.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s fixed now. But flatpak steam on gnome/Wayland would display a black screen on the store when opted into the family beta for a while. Stable was unaffected.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Ah, flatpak. That might be the difference.

  • MrScottyTay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    This bit is a bit fucked up:

    What happens if my brother gets banned for cheating while playing my game?

    If a family member gets banned for cheating while playing your copy of a game, you (the game owner) will also be banned in that game. Other family members are not impacted.

    • hand
      link
      313 months ago

      Not sure I agree, how else are they meant to prevent the ocean of “It wasn’t me, it was my brother” excuses from hackers smurfing accounts?

      I’d recommend (to everyone) that if you’re unsure -or have even the slightest doubt about the person you’re going to give access to your Steam account- to politely decline and play it safe.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They should know the account it is that’s currently using it. They’re not using your account when playing your games

        • arefx
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Bro you can just make a fake account and say it was your little brother , they literally have no idea who signed up or if they lied about account details 🙄

        • hand
          link
          93 months ago

          Unless I’ve misunderstood; that’s exactly why I asked the question in my original comment. I’ll explain my / the reasoning:

          I own a game on a Steam account (A) and want to hack (and evade bans) using another Steam account (B).

          I share my library/game from account (A) to account (B) then hack on account B and only account B gets banned… What’s to then stop me from making Steam account C, D, E, F… etc? Absolutely nothing. Hence the double ban.

          I stress that if you do share a game / your Steam library with others you trust them explicitly.

          • @brygphilomena@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -13 months ago

            Restrict the number of accounts that can join that family group. And/or remove the ability to share the library from the main account for repeated offenses.

            Or require multiple family members accounts to have to cheat before the owner account is banned.

            • @kiagam@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              23 months ago

              stop sharing your library with strangers and kick your brother’s ass when he gets you banned

    • shmanio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      163 months ago

      It is not different from how the previous shared libraries worked. I guess it’s there to stop cheaters from buying a single copy of the game and sharing it with throwaway accounts.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That sort of behaviour should be easy to track if it happens more than once though

        • @dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Being able to evade a ban once is already a problem. Now you need to ban every cheater twice to really ban them.

    • @Epzillon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      I mean, someone should get banned from cheating. I can see why this happen though, since the account playing does not own the game the account which has the game linked gets banned instead. If the account cheating has the game they are instead playing on their copy and that gets banned instead (i assume).

      However the ban should be linked to the account and not the copy of the game. I do not understand why this isnt the case. Maybe because someone could just make a new account and link that to play on instead, therefor never having to buy more than one copy of the game while cheating.

      • @KaiReeve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        Yeah, it’s most likely to prevent someone from using the family feature to get away with cheating.

        As it stands now, if you get caught cheating you must create a new account and repurchase the game. So the main deterrent is the full cost of a game.

        With the steam family function you could potentially create 5 new accounts per year, and simply remove them when they get caught cheating. The only deterrent would be the wait period.

        So I agree with their decision. The downside is that you must trust someone before adding them to your family. If your cheating son gets you kicked off counterstrike, then just remove him from your family. They’re never too old to drop off at the fire station.

        • @Epzillon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          This is indeed the appropriate reaction to being banned on counter strike. Joke aside you could just lock the entire functionality of adding an account to your family if someone got caught cheating though.

    • @dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      My question is, when there are 5 people with 5 copies of a multiplayer game in the pool, and the 6th member without a copy gets banned, which of the other 5 members gets banned?

      • @kiagam@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        when you play a game that multiple people have, you can choose which copy is being used. The owner of that copy and the one playing get banned

      • hand
        link
        13 months ago

        Best guess? Whichever account gave account 6 permission to play their game.

        Either account 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 will be the user that gives 6 the permission to play their game, so it follows they’re the one that (I’m assuming) will get banned also. It’s a good question you raise and I’d be interested to know for sure myself.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I think it’s a great rule. If you’re sharing your library with others, don’t be am asshole and cheat. If you do you’ll be a disappointment to them too. More social pressure to not cheat is only a positive in my opinion, but also I will never cheat and I only share my library with people I’m confident won’t cheat as well. I don’t associate with people who want to ruin other’s fun. If you do then that’s on you. It’s your choice to risk getting banned.

            • @papertowels@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Not sure where you’re going with this - I was implying that there are consequences for cheating, like losing access to a game library even if temporary.

                • @papertowels@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  I can’t even imagine if I were a kid and made my parent lose access to a lot of games.

                  Well it’d be just the one game that they cheated in. That’s where you can sit the kid down and tell him that cheating has consequences. Ideally this talk would’ve happened before you share access though - I’m thinking of it as making sure the kid knows how to drive before you let them borrow the keys to your car.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Unfortunately over here it seems to be doing IP-based location as I’m not able to add my brother who lives in a different part of the same town.

    • @verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -13 months ago

      Yeah this has been a sticking point since the beta, they never responded to the thousands of comments complaining about it. It’s pretty bullshit and makes this feature useless in many circumstances.

  • @taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    63 months ago

    I mean, it’s been here for beta years and yes, it is absolutely fantastic. The one year penalty keeps me from handing it out like candy to extended family and friends (plus we all have that cousin who can’t be trusted) while I can let my wife and kids play games on my account without them kicking me out of mine.

    The parental controls are good too, although I’m not using them yet since my kids are too young to really pick their games from the library themselves.

  • @jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    This is fantastic! I was just trying to set up my kid on a computer and the old way was seeming too clunky and slow, and she wanted to do something else so we never finished it.

      • @fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        My guess is this, which is way at the bottom of the support FAQ page (which can be found at the bottom of the posted FAQ section):

        “I cannot join a Steam Family”

        If you cannot join a Steam Family, it is likely for one of three reasons:

        • Your account activity does not show that you are part of the same household as the existing members.
      • @Kyouki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I cannot invite my gf to the Families, while we could do Library share before just fine.

  • @ReCursing@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So how do I create a Steam Family? I can’t see an option to do so anywhere but I am most likely just missing it… or it hasn’t been rolled out to the UK yet

    edit: found it! For anyone else who is lost like me, go to the top right and click on your use name and then Account Details. From there, Family Management is on the left and it’s obvious

  • @DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Between my wife’s enormous Steam library and Whisky/Crossover on my M2 MacBook, I’ve been playing more games than ever since the beta of this popped up. It’s actually quite impressive how many games just work - albeit with some compromises in places.

  • @Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    23 months ago

    What is this. Because I’m pretty upset that the games I paid for can’t be played on different pc’s. My daughter wants to pay stardew valley while I’m online with family on satisfactory. I have to take the other pc and go into offline mode. This wasn’t the solution. Even with adding members I didn’t think I did it right. So does this fix it? Can my family member log into stardew online with her cousin while I’m on another lan game?

    • @DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yes, you can play Satisfactory while she is playing Stardew Valley, while both of you are online. You now have a number of copies of each game in the family. If 2 members own the same game, then two different members in the family can play both copies at the same time