Southwest Airlines, the fourth largest airline in the US, is seemingly unaffected by the problematic CrowdStrike update that caused millions of computers to BSoD (Blue Screen of Death) because it used Windows 3.1. The CrowdStrike issue disrupted operations globally after a faulty update caused newer computers to freeze and stop working, with many prominent institutions, including airports and almost all US airlines, including United, Delta, and American Airlines, needing to stop flights.

Windows 3.1, launched in 1992, is likely not getting any updates. So, when CrowdStrike pushed the faulty update to all its customers, Southwest wasn’t affected (because it didn’t receive an update to begin with).

The airlines affected by the CrowdStrike update had to ground their fleets because many of their background systems refused to operate. These systems could include pilot and fleet scheduling, maintenance records, ticketing, etc. Thankfully, the lousy update did not affect aircraft systems, ensuring that everything airborne remained safe and were always in control of their pilots.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That makes fuckall sense.

    Windows 3.1 not being updated by Microsoft has nothing to do with Crowdstrike rolling out an update to their Falcon Sensor software including a file with 42kB of zeroes.

    On Windows 3.1 you probably can’t run Falcon Sensor, so in that way it could be related. But it seems way more likely that Southwest Airlines simply didn’t use Falcon Sensor on their normal Windows 10 or whatever clients.

    There are probably competitors to Crowdstrike, at least some companies would be customers to one of them.

  • qisope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Or, for your consideration, could it perhaps be because they don’t use crowdstrike?

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        My wife shared this with me yesterday, but I didn’t see it:

        A joke tweet with an attached image of a smart refrigerator. The refrigerator displays a blue screen of death. The tweet reads “I can’t even open my fridge.” Another tweet is replying to it, taking it seriously and indicating they do not embrace smart technology.

        Somebunny is gonna learn those things aren’t windows-based today!

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          My old thermostat was basically two teaspoons of mercury that would expand and contract with the temperature to short out two leads. They didn’t let me keep it when I got a new one, but I got the dumbest one they had.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I got a new HVAC and smart thermostat about a week ago. After researching, I decided to hook thermostat to wifi and download app. Mostly all the app does is duplicate the same functionality that the thermostat controls have. I find it handy to have a remote control for the thermostat.

            OTOH I decided not to hook up a new washing machine to wifi and use app. It duplicated the functionality of the appliance controls also, but there was no point in having remove controls for a washing machine.

            The critical thing is that an appliance needs to be fully functional without needing to use wifi and certainly not a phone app.